<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zenfolio vs. SmugMug &#8211; Cost Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalnotions.net/zenfolio-vs-smugmug-cost-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalnotions.net/zenfolio-vs-smugmug-cost-comparison/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=zenfolio-vs-smugmug-cost-comparison</link>
	<description>Photography, Blogging, WordPress and SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://digitalnotions.net/zenfolio-vs-smugmug-cost-comparison/#comment-12911</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalnotions.net/?p=600#comment-12911</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Santos</title>
		<link>http://digitalnotions.net/zenfolio-vs-smugmug-cost-comparison/#comment-8740</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Santos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalnotions.net/?p=600#comment-8740</guid>
		<description>thanks for sharing, I am trying both :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for sharing, I am trying both <img src='http://digitalnotions.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krowland</title>
		<link>http://digitalnotions.net/zenfolio-vs-smugmug-cost-comparison/#comment-2487</link>
		<dc:creator>Krowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalnotions.net/?p=600#comment-2487</guid>
		<description>The math on your 25.99 8x10 is off by a dollar. The profit loss difference with SmugMug is actually $1.90, not .90.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The math on your 25.99 8&#215;10 is off by a dollar. The profit loss difference with SmugMug is actually $1.90, not .90.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deni Storm</title>
		<link>http://digitalnotions.net/zenfolio-vs-smugmug-cost-comparison/#comment-2048</link>
		<dc:creator>Deni Storm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalnotions.net/?p=600#comment-2048</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great comparison. I tried Zenfolio&#039;s 14-day trial and really like it. Your cost and quality comparison sealed the deal. Just signed up using your code. Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great comparison. I tried Zenfolio&#8217;s 14-day trial and really like it. Your cost and quality comparison sealed the deal. Just signed up using your code. Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wood</title>
		<link>http://digitalnotions.net/zenfolio-vs-smugmug-cost-comparison/#comment-2029</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalnotions.net/?p=600#comment-2029</guid>
		<description>At current, Zenfolio does seem a bit snappier.  I really can&#039;t put my finger on anything specific, but simply navigating and performing general maintenance tasks seems quicker.

I think your best bet with regards to numbers in the search function is to try it out on Zenfolio and see how it works.  You could also sign up for a trial account (feel free to use my discount code to save a few dollars should you decide to sign up) and test it yourself.  So far, I&#039;ve found the Zenfolio search at least as good as SmugMug, but again, I&#039;m not doing much that&#039;s tricky.

Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At current, Zenfolio does seem a bit snappier.  I really can&#8217;t put my finger on anything specific, but simply navigating and performing general maintenance tasks seems quicker.</p>
<p>I think your best bet with regards to numbers in the search function is to try it out on Zenfolio and see how it works.  You could also sign up for a trial account (feel free to use my discount code to save a few dollars should you decide to sign up) and test it yourself.  So far, I&#8217;ve found the Zenfolio search at least as good as SmugMug, but again, I&#8217;m not doing much that&#8217;s tricky.</p>
<p>Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Andert</title>
		<link>http://digitalnotions.net/zenfolio-vs-smugmug-cost-comparison/#comment-2027</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Andert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalnotions.net/?p=600#comment-2027</guid>
		<description>Great review!  I have been with SmugMug for almost a year and am thinking of switching.  Wondering how performance has been for you? Smug seems a bit sluggish at times and the search function is a bit tricky in how they handle numbers (very important for a race photographer).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review!  I have been with SmugMug for almost a year and am thinking of switching.  Wondering how performance has been for you? Smug seems a bit sluggish at times and the search function is a bit tricky in how they handle numbers (very important for a race photographer).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/13 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: digitalnotions.net @ 2012-02-09 15:06:23 -->
